Powered By Blogger

2012年10月30日星期二

Scientists Move Closer to a Lasting Flu Vaccine

As this year’s flu season gathers steam, doctors and pharmacists have a fresh stock of vaccines to offer their patients. The vaccines usually provide strong protection against the virus, but only for a while. Vaccines for other diseases typically work for years or decades. Withthe flu, though, next fall it will be time to get another dose.


“In the history of vaccinology, it’s the only one we update year to year,” said Gary J. Nabel, the director of the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
That has been the case ever since the flu vaccine was introduced in the 1950s. But a flurry of recent studies on the virus has brought some hope for a change. Dr. Nabel and other flu experts foresee a time when seasonal flu shots are a thing of the past, replaced by long-lasting vaccines.
“That’s the goal: two shots when you’re young, and then boosters later in life. That’s where we’d like to go,” Dr. Nabel said. He predicted that scientists would reach that goal before long — “in our lifetime, for sure, unless you’re 90 years old,” he said.
Such a vaccine would be a great help in the fight against seasonal flu outbreaks, which kill an estimated 500,000 people a year. But in a review to be published in the journalInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Sarah Gilbert ofOxford University argues that they could potentially have an even greater benefit.
Periodically, a radically new type of flu has evolved and rapidly spread around the world. A pandemic in 1918 is estimated to have killed 50 million people.
With current technology, scientists would not have a vaccine for a new pandemic strain until the outbreak was well under way. An effective universal flu vaccine would already be able to fight it.
“Universal vaccination with universal vaccines would put an end to the threat of global disaster that pandemic influenza can cause,” Dr. Gilbert wrote.
Vaccines work by enhancing the protection the immune system already provides. In the battle against the flu, two sets of immune cells do most of the work.
One set, called B cells, makes antibodies that can latch onto free-floating viruses. Burdened by these antibodies, the viruses cannot enter cells.
Once flu viruses get into cells, the body resorts to a second line of defense. Infected cells gather some of the virus proteins and stick them on their surface. Immune cells known as T cells crawl past, and if their receptors latch onto the virus proteins, they recognize that the cell is infected; the T cells then release molecules that rip open the cells and kill them.
This defense mechanism works fairly well, allowing many people to fight off the virus without ever feeling sick. But it also has a built-in flaw: The immune system has to encounter a particular kind of flu virus to develop an effective response against it.
It takes time for B cells to develop tightfitting antibodies. T cells also need time to adjust their biochemistry to make receptors that can lock quickly onto a particular flu protein. While the immune system educates itself, an unfamiliar flu virus can explode into full-blown disease.

Today’s flu vaccines protect people from the virus by letting them make antibodies in advance. The vaccine contains fragments from the tip of a protein on the surface of the virus, called hemagglutinin. B cells that encounter the vaccine fragments learn how to make antibodies against them. When vaccinated people become infected, the B cells can quickly unleash their antibodies against the viruses.
Unfortunately, a traditional flu vaccine can protect against only flu viruses with a matching hemagglutinin protein. If a virus evolves a different shape, the antibodies cannot latch on, and it escapes destruction.
Influenza’s relentless evolution forces scientists to reconfigure the vaccine every year. A few months before flu season, they have to guess which strains will be dominant. Vaccine producers then combine protein fragments from those strains to create a new vaccine.
Scientists have long wondered whether they could escape this evolutionary cycle with a vaccine that could work against any type of influenza. This so-called universal flu vaccine would have to attack a part of the virus that changes little from year to year.
Dr. Gilbert and her colleagues at Oxford are trying to build a T cell-based vaccine that could find such a target. When T cells learn to recognize proteins from one kind of virus, the scientists have found, they can attack many other kinds. It appears that the flu proteins that infected cells select to put on display evolve very little.
The scientists are testing a vaccine that prepares T cells to mount a strong attack against flu viruses. They engineered a virus that can infect cells but cannot replicate. As a result, infected cells put proteins on display, but people who receive the vaccine do not get sick.
In a clinical trial reported this summer, the scientists found that people who received the vaccine developed a strong response from their T cells. “We can bring them up to much higher levels with a single injection,” said Dr. Gilbert, the lead author of the study.
Once the scientists had vaccinated 11 subjects, they exposed them to the flu. Meanwhile, they also exposed 11 unvaccinated volunteers. Two vaccinated people became ill, while five unvaccinated ones did.
While the Oxford researchers focus on T cell vaccines, others are developing vaccines that can generate antibodies that are effective against many flu viruses — or perhaps all of them.
The first hint that such antibodies exist emerged in 1993. Japanese researchers infected mice with the flu virus H1N1. They extracted antibodies from the mice and injected them into other mice. The animals that received the antibodies turned out to be protected against a different kind of flu, H2N2. In hindsight, that discovery was hugely important. But at the time no one made much of it.
“By and large, people just said, ‘This is an oddity — so what?’ ” said Ian Wilson of the Scripps Research Institute.
Scientists did not appreciate its importance for more than 15 years, until Dr. Wilson and other researchers began isolating the antibodies that provided this kind of broad protection and showed how they worked.
The new antibodies turn out to attack different parts of the flu virus from the ones produced by today’s vaccines. Today’s vaccines cause B cells to make antibodies that clamp onto a broad region of the tip of the hemagglutinin protein. Recently, Dr. Wilson and his colleagues discovered a new antibody with a slender tendril. It can snake into a groove in the hemagglutinin tip.
Dr. Wilson and his colleagues found that this tendriled antibody can attach to a wide range of flu viruses. The results hint that the groove — which flu viruses use to attach to host cells — cannot work if its shape changes much.
The antibody is also impressively powerful, the scientists found. They infected mice with a lethal dose of the flu and then, after three days, injected the new antibody into them. The antibody stopped the virus so effectively that the mice recovered.
The hemagglutinin groove is not the only promising target for antibodies. Dr. Wilson and other scientists are discovering antibodies that attack the base of the protein. Influenza viruses can be broadly categorized into three types — A, B and C. Until now, scientists have found only antibodies that attack different versions of influenza A. Dr. Wilson and colleagues at Scripps and the Crucell Vaccine Institute in the Netherlands recently found a stem-attacking antibody that blocks influenzas A and B.
“The whole field is invigorated,” Dr. Wilson said. “It’s a great time.”
Building on these discoveries, Dr. Nabel and other scientists have recently developed vaccines that generate some of the new antibodies in humans. Now they are trying to figure out how to get the body to make a lot of the antibodies.
“Once you have an antibody that has all the properties you desire, how do you coax the immune system to make that?” Dr. Nabel said. “That’s the classic problem in immunology.”

more:

Assassin's Creed 3 doesn't start a revolution, but still amazes

2012年10月29日星期一

Windows 8 - more than the sum of its parts?


Rather than producing killer gadgets, is Microsoft's strength its unified ecosystem?
On Friday I pondered why you'd want to spend $559 on a new Microsoft Surface RT tablet when it only runs Windows RT -- supporting the tile-based Modern UI interface (pictured above) and tablet-style apps. The question is not whether the Surface RT is a slick device. The question is whether it really offers any advantage over the established Apple and Android competitors which enjoy more mature app stores and wider ecosystems of accessories. Personally I'm more interested in Microsoft's Surface Pro and third-party Windows 8 tablets, which offer the best of both worlds with access to Modern UI and traditional desktop applications.

It's likely the success of Windows 8 tablets and smartphones hinges on people's acceptance of Windows 8 on the desktop. 
You might ask the same question about Windows Phone 8 smartphones such as Nokia's Lumia 920. As slick as it is, Windows Phone 8 will struggle to win people away from the Android and Apple flagship handsets. Apart from choice, what exactly do these Windows 8 gadgets bring to the party that make it worth turning your back on both Apple and Google?
The clear response from the pro-Microsoft crowd was that tight integration with the Windows ecosystem is the Surface RT's strength. Cross-platform gaming and integration with the Xbox 360 platform will grab some people's attention, while others might be tempted by the streaming music service. The big attraction for many seems to be Office compatibility along with the flexibility of USB and micro-SD ports. Initially I dismissed the pre-installed Office RT as an advantage because both Apple and Google offer Office alternatives. I'm happy enough to use Windows 7 but personally I stay as far away from Microsoft Office as I can.

But the truth is that many people don't want to use these Office-like alternatives. They live in an Office-centric world, whether it be for work or study, and want a tablet experience which "just works" rather than needing to shift their documents in and out of iCloud or Google Apps. They also want a seamless experience when jumping between desktop and mobile devices, something which can still be hit and miss in the Apple and Google ecosystems.
Ecosystems is the key word here, as it's at the heart of the battle between the technology giants. Once you're an Apple user, for example, it's easier to keep using Apple products and services because they all play nicely together. The more Apple or Android gear you own, the more sense it makes to keep buying the same gear. Unfortunately for Microsoft it's arrived late to the handheld ecosystem party. A lot of people have already sworn their allegiance to Apple or Android even if they still use Windows on the desktop. If this sounds like you, it's quite reasonable to ask why you'd want to embrace the Surface RT rather than an iPad or Android contender.
But the truth is that many people are yet to take the plunge on a smartphone or tablet and thus still haven't aligned themselves with Apple or Android. If they're not particularly tech-savvy they may simply use Windows on the desktop, perhaps more out of necessity than any passion for technology. These people are ripe for the picking, assuming Apple or Android evangelists don't convert them first. Tight compatibility with the Microsoft ecosystem may also win some people away from their Android and Apple gadgets, although that's a tougher challenge.
Windows 8 on the desktop will present a steep learning curve for some people and amazingly Microsoft isn't going out of its way to make it any easier. But once people become familiar with Modern UI on the desktop then Windows tablets and smartphones may seem the logical choice offering zero learning curve.
If Modern UI and interoperability really are Microsoft's killer feature then it needs to do a great job of conveying that in a cross-promotional blitz. It should also make the desktop transition as smooth as possible, rather than risk alienating people by forcing Modern UI down their throat. Users who resent Modern UI on their PC are unlikely to want it on a tablet or smartphone.
It's likely the success of Windows 8 tablets and smartphones hinges on people's acceptance of Windows 8 on the desktop. It will be interesting to see if Microsoft gets this one right.


Read more:  



Silent Hill's only Revelation is that it's terrible

2012年10月23日星期二

X-ray probe catches a bright blast from Milky Way's colossal black hole

These are the first, focused high-energy X-ray views of the area surrounding the supermassive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy, called Sagittarius A*. The three images on the right side show Sagittarius A* before, during and after an X-ray flare that was spotted in July.


For years, astronomers have known about the supermassive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy, but these pictures from NASA's NuSTAR telescope show a rare view of the usually sleeping giant gobbling down a cosmic snack.
"We got lucky to have captured an outburst from the black hole during our observing campaign," Caltech's Fiona Harrison, the $165 million mission's principal investigator, said today in a NASA news release. "These data will help us better understand the gentle giant at the heart of our galaxy and why it sometimes flares up for a few hours and then returns to slumber."
NuSTAR, also known as the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, is an X-ray observatory that was launched in June to study high-energy phenomena such as the tumult that takes place around black holes. Sagittarius A*, which is 4 million times as massive as our sun, is one of the prime targets for observation.
Supermassive black holes like Sagittarius A* commonly form at the center of big galaxies: In fact, they may be an essential piece of the galaxy formation puzzle, and some of them can get pretty violent. Our galaxy's black hole is uncommonly quiet, however, and that's probably a good thing. Only occasionally does matter from the surrounding area fall into its grip. As that matter is sucked into the singularity, it heats up and emits a blast of radiation.
NuSTAR happened to be in the right place at the right time to observe Sagittarius A* for two days in July, along with other observatories. NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory was watching for lower-energy X-rays, while the Keck Observatory on Hawaii's Mauna Kea was taking infrared images.
During the observations, a bright X-ray flash flared up. The emissions were given off by matter that was heated up to about 180 million degrees Fahrenheit (100 mllion degrees Celsius), NASA said. The high-energy readings are being compared with the images in other wavelengths to deepen astronomers' understanding of how black holes gobble up matter and grow.
"Astronomers have long speculated that the black hole's snacking should produce copious hard X-rays, but NuSTAR is the first telescope with sufficient sensitivity to actually detect them," Columbia University's Chuck Hailey, a member of the mission science team, said in today's statement.
Get ready for a gluttonous orgy
NuSTAR and other black-hole watchers are getting set to watch Sagittarius A*, or Sgr A* for short, go into full gobble mode next year: A huge cloud of dust and gas known as G2 is approaching the black hole, and when it gets close enough, gravitational forces will start pulling material in and heating it up. If July's event was a snack, G2's close encounter will be a gluttonous orgy.
Just this week, researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California released a supercomputer simulation showing how the cloud will be disrupted as it passes by Sgr A*. That simulation suggests that the close encounter will last several months, and that G2 will be totally gone in less than a decade.
"It will just sort of break up into some sort of incoherent structure," Peter Anninos, a computational physicist at Livermore Lab, said in a news release. "Much of it will join the rest of the hot accretion disk around the black hole, or just fall and get captured by the black hole. It will lose a lot of energy, but not all of it. It will become so diffuse that it's unlikely that any remnant of the gas will continue on its orbital track."

Check out this Web page for QuickTime animations showing what scientists think will happen to the cloud, and stay tuned for updates on the dietary preferences of our galaxy's not-always-sleeping giant.

more:

2012年10月22日星期一

Best Buy Pre-Order Reveals Windows 8 Phone Pricing: AT&T to Price Nokia Lumia 920 at $149 HTC 8X at $99




A slew of new Windows Phone 8 devices are to be imminently released. We've known about them for awhile. But the one thing that consumers have been kept in the dark about is the pricing. Best Buy has now begun taking pre-orders for two Windows Phone 8 devices, the Nokia Lumia 920 and the HTC 8X on AT&T, which reveals the price info.
Best Buy has listed the Nokia Lumia 920 featuring 32GB for $149 with a two year contract, and the HTC 8X with 8GB for $99 with a two year contract. Both of the devices are priced well to not only compete with other hot smartphones on the market, but the price point is also likely to attract people to the Windows Phone 8 platform that might not have given it a second thought if the phones were priced even just $50 higher each.
Best Buy has the Nokia Lumia 920 available for pre-order in Black, Cyan, Yellow, White and Red. The HTC 8X is available in only Purple, but we expect that will eventually change to include more color options.
Now that some pricing information has been revealed, giving consumers a clue of what to perhaps expect, carrier availability on other non-AT&T networks of the various new Windows Phone 8 devices is what most are looking forward to.


related:

a tangle with resort fees and hotel taxes

2012年10月18日星期四

Ryan Murphy on the 'Asylum' premiere, his inspirations, and if [SPOILER] is dead -- EXCLUSIVE


Nuns! Aliens! Bloody Face! Adam Levine! No one can accuse American Horror Story: Asylumof playing it safe in its wild premiere. A complete reboot of the previous season, AHS: Asylumtook viewers inside Briarcliff Manor for a roller-coaster hour that saw Jessica Lange’s Sister Jude getting sexy in red lingerie and Adam Levine’s Leo losing an arm to something sinister. EW talked to series co-creator Ryan Murphy about the jam-packed hour, his inspirations, and what this means for Levine on the series. 

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: You kept the same music for the opening credits but new visual elements. Are these perhaps clues to the mystery surrounding Briarcliff?
RYAN MURPHY: I think so. We were gonna throw everything out and start from scratch. We built that entire insane asylum. That crew that is so brilliant went in and shot everything on that location months ago. They also had read many of the scripts. Yes I think they’re clues. I think the show in its subject matter has a little more gravity in terms of social significance this year, so some of them aren’t so much clues as metaphors. For example, the girl walking up and down in the staircase, in episode 2 you will definitely know what that’s about.
To me the editing and the energy felt very different to me. It almost feels like it’s supposed to keep you off-balance, like you don’t know what you’re seeing. Is that what you were going for?When Brad and I did season 1, it was definitely influenced by masters like [Stanley] Kubrick. This year the thing that I was really obsessed with is I was really influenced by DePalma, who I think is a brilliant filmmaker, who I really feel like never gets his just desserts. It’s time for a Brian DePalma resurgence. So I was very into the filming style of DePalma’s works, specifically Dressed to Kill and Carrie. There’s a lot of slow motion, there’s a lot of languid filmmaking. In the first episode, as a tribute to Brian, we actually used two big pieces fromCarrie’s score. So the same can be said of DePalma’s work which is very fever dream. Look at that last scene of Carrie—was it real? Was it a dream? So yes it was very influenced by his work particularly. Also it was very influenced by [Dario] Argento. The other great thing about it is Brad Buecker, who edited all the shows last year, who’s my right hand man, is also a brilliant director. The first two were edited and directed by Brad. It’s very interesting when an editor directs. It’s much more I think a psychological thriller as well.
AMERICAN HORROR STORYGet the latest news, photos, and more
Last year, it’s interesting to me, because people said to me “Oh the Harmon family is so venal and so terrible and we don’t root for them.” I think this year you have 3 or 4 people you’re really rooting for — definitely Jessica, definitely Evan, definitely Sarah, definitely Chloe. This year we’re really exploring the idea of madness, and I think madness, for people caught in that web, it must feel like a hallucinogenic nightmare reality.
DePalma was also clearly very influenced by Hitchcock. But DePalma was able to use sex in a much more graphic way. Obviously, American Horror Story will always be about sex and violence. But I’m really thrilled to talk about DePalma. One of our writers on our show, Jennifer Salt, starred in a Brian DePalma movie [1973's Sisters]. They’re still really good friends.
You should get him to direct an episode!Ha! I doubt he would come to television, but it certainly would be worth a call. I love him. I think he’s a very underrated filmmaker.
My colleague Jeff Jensen wants to know if you’re gonna direct an episode?I really want to. It’s hard with three shows. The New Normal, I directed four of the first shows. I’m getting ready to do a Glee. I have a really nifty plan for the last episode of Horror Story this year. If I can make that work, I will. I want to.
Will the search for Alma and her disappearance be a driving mystery the whole season?It continues for the whole season. It’s an interesting idea, which is for the audience basically to find out were the aliens real or were they all in his mind? We studied a lot about alien abductions, particularly the year we’re writing about. We say in the first episode that 1964 was a very important year in which religion and science collided. Right around the time of the space program is when a lot of people claimed alien abduction theories. I’ve always been obsessed with alien abduction theories because one of my best friends tells me over and over again that she was abducted and experimented on. So it’s a fascinating thing to write about.
We saw the alien limbs. But will we see its face?Yes. We overshot the s— out of it. What we did last year with the infantata is you saw it for literally like 3 frames. It’s a very similar experience where we don’t show many of the creatures in the woods which are called Raspers. We don’t show too much. We want you to get invested in the story but we do show more.
One person we do see is Bloody Face. So is the modern day Bloody Face the same from the 1960s?It could be. You definitely get the answer to that.
The twist with Adam Levine being dismembered within the first five minutes was pretty shocking. But he’s still in a bunch of episodes right?Yes, he is going to be in a bunch of episodes. I mean, it’s clear after the first episode that he’s in a bad place. I wanted a big star in that. We actually wrote it for him. He did such a great job. He has this great movie star charisma. But what Janet Leigh was to Psycho, Adam is to this season of American Horror Story. He does not perish as quickly as anybody. And maybe he lives — I’m not saying anything.
But Leo and Teresa won’t bookend every episode right?No. We made the decision to do a period piece but I really wanted to examine the Bloody Face legend. So this year we do sort of have a story within a story. The 2012 stuff is not in every episode. We skip around a little bit. But it’s definitely part of the storytelling engine and all designed to completely wrap up in the very last episode and the very last scene. I think it’s cool to tell a very modern story within a period frame work. I love the new Briarcliff dissolving into the old Briarcliff.
Will we find out what knocked out Lana, like, whose arm that was?Oh yeah. It’s the fun thing about the show. Who is Bloody Face? Is Bloody Face still alive? What’s behind that door? Will Adam Levine live? What the hell is Dr. Arden making in that lab? Just another day in the writer’s room of American Horror Story. These are all mysteries very similar to last year where in the first episode we launched 5 or 6 mysteries and you follow them.
Is Eric Stonestreet coming back?Yeah, we’re figuring that out.
And Ian McShane is gonna be on?Ian McShane is coming on. I’m really excited about the Ian McShane part. I have loved him for a really long time. This is an interesting year in American Horror Story in that after episode 9, we go on a holiday break and then come back in January. So I really wanted like two-episode climactic thing and I wanted someone who could go head to head with Jessica Lange. We’ve written him a really amazing part that he starts shooting today. They’re episodes 8 and 9.
And Frances Conroy? You tweeted that she’s playing someone angelic.Yes. I don’t want to give that away because that doesn’t happen ’til I think episode 7, but it’s one of my favorite episodes. Frances appears there and then comes back and forth throughout the season.
And Franka Potente?Yep she’s amazing and she’s in episodes 4 and 5.
Can you tease next week’s episode, “Trick and Treats?”It’s our Halloween episode, and it’s about the powers of Satan. It’s about a boy who is or is not possessed who suddenly, strangely knows a lot about Sister Jude’s secrets.

more interest:

Kutcher tops Forbes' list of highest paid TV actors

Exoplanet around Alpha Centauri is nearest-ever

Next Skyrim DLC called Dragonborn?

2012年10月17日星期三

Ministers meet for crunch biodiversity talks


HYDERABAD, India — The high-level gathering comes two years after UN countries agreed at a conference in Japan to reverse by 2020 the worrying decline in plant and animal species that humans depend on for food, shelter and livelihoods.
The 2010 meeting came up with a 20-point plan which is being hamstrung by a lack of money for conservation programmes at a time of global financial austerity.

"The critical issue really is how to mobilise the necessary financial, technical and human resources," Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told delegates at a meeting in Hyderabad of the UN's Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) on Tuesday.
The convention, to which 193 countries are signatories, marks its 20th anniversary this year.
In that time, it has already missed one key deadline when it failed to meet the target set to halt biodiversity loss by 2010.
Nearly half of amphibian species, a third of corals, a quarter of mammals, a fifth of all plants and 13 percent of the world's birds are at risk of extinction, according to the "Red List" compiled by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) which is due to be updated on Wednesday.
A three-day minister's meeting from Wednesday to Friday comes at the tail-end of two weeks of negotiations by senior bureaucrats from 184 CBD parties -- talks that delegates say have become stuck on the question of financing.
"Obviously to some extent a financial crisis in many of the traditional donor countries is playing into the negotiations," UN Environment Programme executive director Achim Steiner told AFP.
"Also there is still work that needs to be done on what exactly is the financial framework, the order of magnitude that we are talking about."
The next 48 hours of negotiations, he added, "will be on amounts of money".
Sandrine Belier, one of three European Parliament negotiators in Hyderabad, added: "The European Union has not succeeded in forming a common position (on financing), and so it is silent."
Estimates vary, but experts say hundreds of billions of dollars will be required to achieve the targets set in Japan.
These include halving the rate of habitat loss, expanding water and land areas under conservation, preventing the extinction of species on the threatened list, and restoring at least 15 percent of degraded ecosystems by 2020.
Current conservation spending is estimated at about $10 billion per year.
"I urge the parties to the CBD to agree to some measures, commitments and targets of resource mobilisation, even if on an interim basis, so as to infuse confidence in parties and also to generate momentum," India's environment minister Jayanthi Natarajan told delegates on Tuesday.

more you like:

Kobe Bryant helps out Alex Rodriguez

Mice Can ‘Sing’ and Learn Songs Just like Humans

http://newtroubleofworld.blogspot.com/

2012年10月15日星期一

Water on the moon? Maybe a lot more than we thought ... thanks to the sun.

A new study finds 'an unanticipated, abundant reservoir' of water on the moon, molecules formed on the surfaces of oxygen-bearing rocks bombarded by protons from the solar wind.

The moon's top layer of crushed rock and soil may hold far more water than previously estimated, according to a new study.

Most of that water can trace its origin to protons streaming from the sun, the researchers show, confirming in samples of lunar soil a mechanism for making lunar water that until now largely had been the province of theoretical models.
The find "represents an unanticipated, abundant reservoir" of water on the moon, according to researchers from three US universities, who formally reported their results Sunday in the journal NatureGeoscience. And it could help explain the presence of water on other airless planets and asteroids in the inner solar system.
Are you scientifically literate? Take or quiz.
Reservoir does not mean a source of readily tapped liquid, the researchers caution. The evidence shows up as hydroxyl – a single oxygen and hydrogen atom representing two thirds of a standard water molecule. Hydroxyl and water molecules are captured in tiny deposits of glass in rock and soil grains. The glass forms from heat generated when micrometeoroids slam into the surface and fuse soil grains into tiny clumps.
Still, the mini clumps containing the glass may represent between 50 and 70 percent of the material making up lunar soils, says Lawrence Taylor, a University of Tennessee geochemist who advised Apollo astronauts gathering lunar samples and has been studying those samples ever since.
"That means you've got a lot of water stuck around in this glass that we never even thought too much about before," says Dr. Taylor, who was a member of the research team.
The notion that the moon has water or hydroxyls dates back at least to the early 1960s, when researchers at the California Institute of Technology proposed that water ice might exist in the perpetually dark – and frigid – depths of craters at the moon's poles. These were suggested as the final resting places for water ice deposited by collisions between the moon and comets.
Water's presence on the moon is of more than academic interest. Split into oxygen and hydrogen, water represents a source of raw material for rocket fuel. Finding water on the moon in a form that would be relatively easy to exploit would open the possibility of using the moon as a destination as well as a staging area for human exploration beyond low-Earth orbit and living off the “land” while doing it.
Over the past decade in particular, several lines of evidence have demonstrated that the presence of water molecules and hydroxyls on the moon "is more abundant than we thought," says Paul Spudis, a geologist with the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston. The most-high-profile evidence came from India's Chandrayaan 1 orbiter, launched in the fall of 2008, and NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter-LCROSS mission in 2009.

For instance, for LCROSS, NASA sent the upper stage of the rocket that launched the mission crashing into Cabeus Crater at the moon's south pole. Water was detected in the plume of debris that the collision kicked up, as was ammonia and methane.
But finding water in such sunless "cold traps" said little about where the water came from. hydrogen forming the waterthere, let alone the hydrogen signatures showing up elsewhere on the surface.
Some of the water could have come as ice from comets colliding with the moon. A second source: in effect, the sun, whose endless stream of "solar wind" protons strike the moon's sunlit hemisphere. Bind a pair of those protons to an oxygen atom, readily available in the minerals that make up the lunar soil, and you get a water molecule. Finally, water and hydroxyl molecules also are bound up in volcanic rock and soil that originated as water-bearing magma in the moon's interior.
This latest study builds on work published earlier this year by Taylor and colleagues, in which they bombarded samples of lunar soils with hydrogen ions (protons) and ions of a heavier form of hydrogen called deuterium, which has a proton and a neutron. When the team sent these ions streaming at the soil at energy levels similar to their counterparts in the solar wind, collisions with minerals in the soil formed hydroxyl and its deuterium counterpart.
The new study, led by Yang Liu, a post-doctoral researcher working with Taylor at the University of Tennessee, not only uncovered evidence for hydroxyls in the tiny glass spheres embedded in the fused soil clumps. The team also used the ratio of two forms of hydrogen – simple hydrogen and heavier deuterium – to identify the sun as the source of most of the hydrogen the hydroxyl molecules the glass contained.
The samples Dr. Liu's group studied came from three Apollo landing sites near the lunar equator. But given the ubiquity of the collision-fused clumps in the lunar soil, the team suggests that the ices trapped at the poles could well contain hydrogen from the solar wind as well.
That may already be the case, Spudis suggests. With the discovery of water on the moon, researchers have noted that the moon appears to have its own water cycle – one in which water vapor migrates toward the poles. Water or hydroxyl molecules formed via the solar wind would take part in that migration.
The new study, he says, represents the latest link in a chain of research over the past four or five years that shows the moon as "more rich, more complex, and more interesting than we ever thought. And there's a lot about it we still don't know."




related:http://newtroubleofworld.blogspot.com/2012/10/giant-florida-eyeball-belonged-to.html